<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Royal Deer Design &#187; web site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/tag/web-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com</link>
	<description>Web Design Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Search Engine Market Share is changing, so SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/search-engine-market-share-is-changing-so-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/search-engine-market-share-is-changing-so-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheuli]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coot.arvixe.com/~royald/?p=2202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Google dominates the search market, many SEO experts stopped optimizing their sites for other engines. That can change when the Bing-Yahoo integration happens. It can happen that Bing will get up to 30 percent of the search engine market. Based on current search market share statistics, if Microsoft&#8217;s Bing search technology starts generating results]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Google dominates the search market, many SEO experts stopped optimizing their sites for other engines. That can change when the Bing-Yahoo integration happens.</p>
<p>It can happen that Bing will get up to 30 percent of the search engine market. Based on current search market share statistics, if Microsoft&#8217;s Bing search technology starts generating results for Yahoo, search engine Bing will account for 30 percent of the search engine market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/search-engine-market-share-is-changing-so-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 billion tweets in May</title>
		<link>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/2-billion-tweets-in-may/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/2-billion-tweets-in-may/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheuli]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweeter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coot.arvixe.com/~royald/?p=2205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 2010, Tweeter were generated 50 million tweets a day (it is 600 tweets per second). Now in May 2010, Tweeter reached 2 billion tweets per month. Some statistics of Twitter for May 2010: &#8211; 64 million tweets per day. &#8211; 2.7 million tweets per hour. &#8211; 44,481 tweets per minute. &#8211; 741 tweets]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 2010, Tweeter were generated 50 million tweets a day (it is 600 tweets per second). Now in May 2010, Tweeter reached 2 billion tweets per month.</p>
<p>Some statistics of Twitter for May 2010:<br />
&#8211; 64 million tweets per day.<br />
&#8211; 2.7 million tweets per hour.<br />
&#8211; 44,481 tweets per minute.<br />
&#8211; 741 tweets per second. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/2-billion-tweets-in-may/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality of Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/quality-of-wikipedia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/quality-of-wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheuli]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coot.arvixe.com/~royald/?p=2222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers from Thomas Jefferson University checked the accuracy of information on the popular open-source encyclopedia Wikipedia with that on the National Cancer Institute&#8217;s Physician Data Query. PDQ is a professional database that is peer-reviewed and edited. Both sources were fact-checked against textbooks. The final conclusion: Wikipedia is accurate but poorly written. Results shows that Wikipedia]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers from Thomas Jefferson University checked the accuracy of information on the popular open-source encyclopedia Wikipedia with that on the National Cancer Institute&#8217;s Physician Data Query. PDQ is a professional database that is peer-reviewed and edited. Both sources were fact-checked against textbooks. The final conclusion: Wikipedia is accurate but poorly written.</p>
<p>Results shows that Wikipedia is not worse than the professional website. Only 2% of the information on either was different than in textbooks. However, it is interesting that researchers found that Wikipedia&#8217;s information was written at a higher level of complexity than the professional PDQ.</p>
<p>The study says that Wikipedia is as accurate source of information as a professionally reviewed resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/06/quality-of-wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook is number one in the Top 1000 websites</title>
		<link>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/05/facebook-is-number-one-in-the-top-1000-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/05/facebook-is-number-one-in-the-top-1000-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 17:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheuli]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdPlanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coot.arvixe.com/~royald/?p=2241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the newest data from Google&#8217;s AdPlanner, Facebook is the most-visited destination on the web. Stats show Facebook has 570 billion page views and 540 million users. More info at: www.google.com/adplanner/static/top1000/]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the newest data from Google&#8217;s AdPlanner, Facebook is the most-visited destination on the web. Stats show Facebook has 570 billion page views and 540 million users.</p>
<p><em>More info at: www.google.com/adplanner/static/top1000/</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royaldeerdesign.com/2010/05/facebook-is-number-one-in-the-top-1000-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
